Hunter v. Rohrer et al
Filing
17
ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 11 Motion for service by the United States Marshal Service, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Darrick Hunter, Prisoner ID: 320996)(CMG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
10
DARRICK L. HUNTER,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05198-BHS-JRC
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SERVICE
v.
CHARLES N. ROHRER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Plaintiff Darrick L. Hunter, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil
17
rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for service by the
18
United States Marshal Service. Dkt. 11.
19
After screening plaintiff’s complaint, the Court directed the Clerk to serve the complaint
20
on plaintiff’s named defendants. Dkt. 4. Several defendants filed waivers of service, but
21
defendant Gilbert had not. See Dkts. 7-10. In June of 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for service by
22
the Marshal Service. Dkt. 11. He stated that he had diligently attempted to procure the address of
23
24
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SERVICE - 1
1
defendant Gilbert in order to perfect service on her, but was unsuccessful. Id. He asked the
2
Court to direct the Marshall Service to serve his complaint on defendant Gilbert. Id.
3
However, after plaintiff filed his motion, defendant Gilbert entered a waiver of service
4
and subsequently filed an answer to his complaint. Dkts. 14, 16. As such, plaintiff’s request to
5
direct service on defendant Gilbert is now moot.
6
7
8
Therefore, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion to direct service by the Marshal Service
(Dkt. 11) as moot.
Dated this 25th day of July, 2018.
9
10
11
A
12
J. Richard Creatura
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SERVICE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?