Hunter v. Rohrer et al

Filing 17

ORDER denying as moot Plaintiff's 11 Motion for service by the United States Marshal Service, signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Darrick Hunter, Prisoner ID: 320996)(CMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 DARRICK L. HUNTER, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05198-BHS-JRC ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SERVICE v. CHARLES N. ROHRER, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff Darrick L. Hunter, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 17 rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for service by the 18 United States Marshal Service. Dkt. 11. 19 After screening plaintiff’s complaint, the Court directed the Clerk to serve the complaint 20 on plaintiff’s named defendants. Dkt. 4. Several defendants filed waivers of service, but 21 defendant Gilbert had not. See Dkts. 7-10. In June of 2018, plaintiff filed a motion for service by 22 the Marshal Service. Dkt. 11. He stated that he had diligently attempted to procure the address of 23 24 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SERVICE - 1 1 defendant Gilbert in order to perfect service on her, but was unsuccessful. Id. He asked the 2 Court to direct the Marshall Service to serve his complaint on defendant Gilbert. Id. 3 However, after plaintiff filed his motion, defendant Gilbert entered a waiver of service 4 and subsequently filed an answer to his complaint. Dkts. 14, 16. As such, plaintiff’s request to 5 direct service on defendant Gilbert is now moot. 6 7 8 Therefore, the Court denies plaintiff’s motion to direct service by the Marshal Service (Dkt. 11) as moot. Dated this 25th day of July, 2018. 9 10 11 A 12 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SERVICE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?