Stacie v. Berryhill

Filing 24

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 22 Motion for Attorney Fees to 42 U.S.C.§ 406(b). Signed by Judge James L. Robart. (PM)

Download PDF
United States District Judge James L. Robart 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 9 CHRISTOPHER B. STACIE, 10 Plaintiff, 11 vs. 12 13 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) ) CIVIL NO. 3:18-cv-5314-JLR ) ) ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES ) PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) ) ) ) ) ) 15 16 THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the undersigned upon Plaintiff’s 17 Motion For Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C.§ 406(b), the Court having considered the 18 contentions of Plaintiff and Defendant, this motion being unopposed by the Commissioner, good 19 20 cause having been shown for entry of the Order, now therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s attorney Elie Halpern is awarded a gross attorney’s fee of 21 $13,402.50 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), reduced by the EAJA fees of $13,120.01 that 22 23 24 25 previously were awarded, leaving a net fee of $282.49. When issuing the 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) check for payment to Plaintiff’s attorney herein, Social Security is directed to send to Plaintiff’s attorney the net balance of $282.49, minus any applicable processing fees as allowed by statute ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) - 1 Halpern Olivares PLLC 2102 Carriage Drive SW, Building E102 Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 753-8055, Fax: (360) 753-8584 Ehalpern7379@gmail.com 1 DATED this 18th day of June, 2020 A 2 ___________________________ 3 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 4 Presented by: 5 6 7 Elie Halpern____________ Elie Halpern, WSB No. 1519 Attorney for Plaintiff 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) - 2 Halpern Olivares PLLC 2102 Carriage Drive SW, Building E102 Olympia, WA 98502 (360) 753-8055, Fax: (360) 753-8584 Ehalpern7379@gmail.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?