Cobb v. Shaffer et al

Filing 7

ORDER referring case to the District Court pursuant to the 6 Amended Complaint filed by Christopher Lee Cobb. Signed by Magistrate Judge J Richard Creatura. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Christopher Cobb, Prisoner ID: 892844)(CMG)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 CHRISTOPHER LEE COBB, Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05336-BHS-JRC ORDER REREFERRING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT v. KORY SHAFFER, et al., Defendant. 15 16 Plaintiff Christopher Lee Cobb, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil 17 rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to this Court’s order, plaintiff has filed an 18 amended complaint. Dkt. 6. However, plaintiff’s amended complaint now contains only 19 allegations of events that occurred before his arrest. It no longer contains any allegations 20 pertaining to his conditions of confinement orotherwise seeking post-conviction relief. 21 A United States Magistrate Judge has the authority to conduct hearings and submit to the 22 District Court reports and recommendations on “applications for posttrial relief made by 23 individuals convicted of criminal offenses and of prisoner petitions challenging conditions of 24 ORDER REREFERRING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT -1 1 confinement.” 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B). Despite the fact that plaintiff is a Washington state 2 prisoner, because plaintiff’s amended complaint falls in neither statutory category, the 3 undersigned magistrate judge may no longer examine and make a recommendation on plaintiff’s 4 case. 5 Therefore, is it ORDERED: 6 The Clerk is directed to re-refer this matter to the Honorable Benjamin H. Settle for 7 8 further proceedings. Dated this 13th day of June, 2018. A 9 10 J. Richard Creatura United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ORDER REREFERRING CASE TO DISTRICT COURT -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?