Smith v. L'Heureux et al

Filing 67

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 65 Motion for Composition of the Record on Appeal. Signed by Judge Tana Lin. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Jess Smith, Prisoner ID: 739951)(LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10
11
12
13

CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05427-TL

JESS RICHARD SMITH,
v.

Plaintiff(s),

ORDER

SGT. ELLIS et al.,

14

Defendant(s).

15
16
17
18

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s motion for composition of the record on
appeal. Dkt. No. 65. Having considered the relevant record, the Court hereby DENIES the motion.
I.

19
20

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Jess Richard Smith appeals this Court’s order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s

21

Report and Recommendation and granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No.

22

61 (order); Dkt. No. 63 (notice of appeal). Mr. Smith now moves this Court to “order

23

composition of the record on appeal to the 9th Circuit,” citing Federal Rules of Appellate

24

Procedure (“FRAP”) 10(a) and 11. Dkt. No. 65, at 1.

ORDER - 1

II.

1
2

DISCUSSION

The Ninth Circuit has electronic access to the record of this case as filed in this Court.

3

Further, the Ninth Circuit may specifically request all or part of the record, in which case “[t]he

4

district court clerk shall transmit the record . . . within 7 days of receiving the request.” Ninth

5

Circuit Rule 11-4.4. Here, no such request from the Ninth Circuit has been received.

6

The Ninth Circuit does require parties to file Excerpts of Record, containing all the

7

documents in the record that are necessary to understand and decide the issues on appeal. Ninth

8

Circuit Rule 30-1.1; see also advisory committee note to Rule 30-1.1. However, because

9

Mr. Smith is a party “proceeding without counsel,” he does not need to file Excerpts of Record;

10

instead, that obligation goes to Defendants. See Ninth Circuit Rules 30-1.2, 30-1.2. Cf. Wahl v.

11

Sutton, No. 1:16-cv-01576-LJO-BAM (PC), 2019 WL 5536318, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2019)

12

(denying pro se, in forma pauperis prisoner appellant’s motion for the record on appeal on

13

similar grounds).

14

The Court appreciates Plaintiff’s review of the appellate rules and desire to ensure that

15

the Ninth Circuit has the record it needs, but no action from Plaintiff or this Court on

16

transmitting the records to the Ninth Circuit seems to be required at this time.

17

III.

18
19
20

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for “composition of the record on appeal” (Dkt. No. 65)
is DENIED.
Dated this 8th day of July 2022.

A

21
22

Tana Lin
United States District Judge

23
24
ORDER - 2