Gilmore v. Haynes

Filing 5

ORDER Substituting Respondent and DIRECTING SERVICE on Ron Haynes and WA State Attorney General's Office via email, signed by Magistrate Judge David W. Christel. (Attachments: # 1 pro se instruction sheet)**4 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Paul Gilmore, Prisoner ID: 382868)(CMG)(copy of service order and petition with attachments emailed on 6/26/18 to Ron Haynes & WA State AG's office.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 PAUL ALAN GILMORE, Petitioner, 9 10 v. 11 CASE NO. 3:18-cv-05496-BHS-DWC ORDER SUBSTITUTING RESPONDENT AND FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION RON HAYNES, Respondent. 12 13 14 This is a federal habeas action filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner is currently 15 incarcerated at the Stafford Creek Corrections Center and is subject to the Court’s Prisoner E16 Filing Initiative pursuant to General Order 06-16. The Court, having reviewed Petitioner’s 17 federal habeas Petition, hereby finds and ORDERS as follows: 18 (1) In his Petition, Petitioner named the State of Washington as Respondent. 19 However, under Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, “the petition must name 20 as respondent the state officer who has custody.” Petitioner is currently confined at the Stafford 21 Creek Corrections Center in Aberdeen, Washington. See Dkt. 1-1, p. 1. The Superintendent of 22 the Stafford Creek Corrections Center is Ron Haynes. Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to 23 substitute Ron Haynes as the Respondent in this action. ORDER SUBSTITUTING RESPONDENT AND FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION - 1 1 (2) The Clerk shall arrange for service by email upon respondent and upon the 2 Attorney General of the State of Washington, of copies of the petition, of all documents in 3 support thereof, and of this Order. The Clerk shall also direct a copy of this Order and of the 4 Court’s pro se instruction sheet to petitioner. 5 (3) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent(s) shall file and serve an 6 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in United States 7 District Courts. As part of such answer, respondent(s) shall state whether petitioner has 8 exhausted available state remedies and whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary. 9 Respondent(s) shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without first showing 10 cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent(s) shall file the answer with the Clerk of 11 the Court and serve a copy of the answer on petitioner. 12 (4) The answer will be treated in accordance with LCR 7. Accordingly, on the face 13 of the answer, respondent(s) shall note it for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing. 14 Petitioner may file and serve a response not later than the Monday immediately preceding the 15 Friday designated for consideration of the matter, and respondent(s) may file and serve a reply 16 not later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 17 (5) 18 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents Filing by Parties, Generally 19 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Petitioner shall file all documents electronically. 20 All filings must indicate in the upper right hand corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom 21 the document is directed. 22 23 ORDER SUBSTITUTING RESPONDENT AND FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION - 2 1 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 2 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. Petitioner 3 shall indicate the date the document is submitted for e-filing as the date of service. 4 (6) 5 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. Motions 6 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 7 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 8 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 9 consideration on the Court’s motion calendar. 10 (7) 11 No direct communication is to take place with the District Judge or Magistrate Judge with Direct Communications with District Judge or Magistrate Judge 12 regard to this case. All relevant information and papers are to be directed to the Clerk. 13 Dated this 26th day of June, 2018. 15 A 16 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 14 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER SUBSTITUTING RESPONDENT AND FOR SERVICE AND ANSWER, § 2254 PETITION - 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?