Klopman-Baerselman et al v. 3M Company et al

Filing 685

ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.'S RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, striking 682 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Robert J. Bryan. (JL)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10
11
12

ERIC KLOPMAN-BAERSELMAN, as
Personal Representative for the Estate
of RUDIE KLOPMANBAERSELMAN, deceased,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff,
v.

CASE NO. C18-5536 RJB
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL
INC.’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Honeywell International Inc.’s
(“Honeywell”) Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment. Dkt. 682. The Court is familiar with
the record and has reviewed the motion, and it is fully advised.
The Court should strike Honeywell’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (filed on
December 20, 2019, and noted for January 10, 2020) as untimely and disruptive to the trial and
pretrial scheduling order. See Dkt. 275 (setting trial for January 13, 2020, and ordering
“Dispositive motions due by 11/7/2019, Motions in Limine due by 12/12/2019, Pretrial Order

24
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 1

1

due by 12/27/2019, Pretrial Conference set for 1/3/2020”). If appropriate, the Court can resolve

2

at trial the issues of whether (1) Plaintiff judicially admitted that he has no claim against

3

Honeywell, and (2) Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages should be denied.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Therefore, Honeywell’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 682) is
STRICKEN.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to all counsel of record and
to any party appearing pro se at said party’s last known address.
Dated this 23rd day of December, 2019.

A
ROBERT J. BRYAN
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER STRIKING DEFENDANT HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.’S RENEWED MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT - 2