Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Olympic Game Farm Inc et al

Filing 222

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 187 Motion to Seal. Dkt. # 188 shall remain under seal. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-06025-RSL Document 222 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 12 OLYMPIC GAME FARM, INC., et al., 13 Case No. C18-6025RSL ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (Dkt. # 187) Defendants. 14 This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion to File Under Seal.” Dkt. 15 16 # 187. Pursuant to LCR 5(g), plaintiff seeks to seal an agreement designated as confidential by 17 defendants. Although there is a strong presumption of public access to the court’s files, the 18 decades-old agreement and its terms were relevant only to the determination of whether Ms. 19 Carrizosa’s deposition testimony should be maintained under seal: it is not relevant to any claims 20 or defense at issue in this case. Thus, the interests of the public in viewing the document are 21 minimal and do not outweigh defendants’ interests in keeping the record secret. 22 23 // 24 25 // 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (Dkt. # 187) - 1 Case 3:18-cv-06025-RSL Document 222 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2 1 2 For the foregoing reasons, plaintiff’s motion to seal (Dkt. # 187) is GRANTED. Dkt. # 188 shall remain under seal. 3 4 Dated this 10th day of January, 2022. 5 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (Dkt. # 187) - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?