Ballou v. McElvain et al

Filing 229

ORDER granting City Defendants' 228 Motion for Leave to File Over-length Motions and Briefs. Defendant is granted an additional 800 words to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 215 ), meaning the brief may be 5,000 words or less. Plaintiff's reply brief, if any, may include an additional 400 words for a total of 2,500 words. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo.(MW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Hon. David G. Estudillo 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 JULIE BALLOU, 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. JAMES McELVAIN, P.H.D., in his individual and representative capacity; and CITY OF VANCOUVER, a municipal corporation, No. 3:19-cv-05002-DGE ORDER GRANTING CITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OVERLENGTH BRIEF Defendants. Defendant City of Vancouver’s motion for leave to file an overlength brief is GRANTED. Defendant is granted an additional 800 words to respond to Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees (Dkt. 215), meaning the brief may be 5,000 words or less. Plaintiff’s reply brief, if any, may include an additional 400 words for a total of 2,500 words. LCR 7(e)(4), (f)(4). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 3rd day of June 2024. 22 A 23 24 David G. Estudillo 25 ORDER - 1 (W.D. Wash. Cause No. 3:19-cv-05002-DGE) 1 United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER - 2 (W.D. Wash. Cause No. 3:19-cv-05002-DGE) 1 Presented by: 2 CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE VANCOUVER, WASHINGTON 3 4 5 6 7 By: /s/ Daniel G. Lloyd Daniel G. Lloyd, WSBA No. 34221 Assistant City Attorney Attorney for Defendants PO Box 1995 Vancouver, WA 98668-1995 Tel: 360.487.8500; Fax: 360.487.8501 dan.lloyd@cityofvancouver.us 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ORDER - 3 (W.D. Wash. Cause No. 3:19-cv-05002-DGE)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?