Archuleta v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
12
ORDER ON STIPULATED REMAND re 11 Stipulated MOTION to Remand filed by Commissioner of Social Security by Judge David W. Christel. (KEB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
JOSEPH ARCHULETA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
Civil No. 3:19-CV-5294-DWC
ORDER ON STIPULATED REMAND
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
14
Defendant.
15
Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned
16
case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to
17
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge shall:
18
(1) hold a de novo hearing;
19
(2) evaluate the entire relevant period beginning July 11, 2013;
20
(3) admit the March 2018 functional capacity evaluation into the record and evaluate the
opinion of Christina Casady, OTR;
21
(4) reevaluate the opinion evidence, including the opinions of Dr. Blair, Dr. Judish, and
22
PA Sumrall.
23
Page 1
ORDER - [3:19-CV-5294-DWC]
1
(5) reevaluate the claimant’s symptom testimony;
2
(6) reassess the claimant’s residual functional capacity;
3
(7) continue with the sequential evaluation process, obtaining vocational expert testimony
4
as necessary; and
5
(8) issue a new decision.
6
This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds, and Plaintiff is entitled to
7
reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs pursuant to 28
8
U.S.C. § 1920, upon proper request to this Court.
9
DATED this 9th day of September, 2019.
10
A
11
12
David W. Christel
United States Magistrate Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Presented by:
s/ Stephen Dmetruk
STEPHEN DMETRUK
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A
Seattle, WA 98104-7075
Telephone: (206) 615-3725
Fax: (206) 615-2531
stephen.dmetruk@ssa.gov
21
22
23
Page 2
ORDER - [3:19-CV-5294-DWC]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?