Archuleta v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 12

ORDER ON STIPULATED REMAND re 11 Stipulated MOTION to Remand filed by Commissioner of Social Security by Judge David W. Christel. (KEB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION 8 9 10 JOSEPH ARCHULETA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 Civil No. 3:19-CV-5294-DWC ORDER ON STIPULATED REMAND COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 14 Defendant. 15 Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned 16 case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings pursuant to 17 sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the administrative law judge shall: 18 (1) hold a de novo hearing; 19 (2) evaluate the entire relevant period beginning July 11, 2013; 20 (3) admit the March 2018 functional capacity evaluation into the record and evaluate the opinion of Christina Casady, OTR; 21 (4) reevaluate the opinion evidence, including the opinions of Dr. Blair, Dr. Judish, and 22 PA Sumrall. 23 Page 1 ORDER - [3:19-CV-5294-DWC] 1 (5) reevaluate the claimant’s symptom testimony; 2 (6) reassess the claimant’s residual functional capacity; 3 (7) continue with the sequential evaluation process, obtaining vocational expert testimony 4 as necessary; and 5 (8) issue a new decision. 6 This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds, and Plaintiff is entitled to 7 reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs pursuant to 28 8 U.S.C. § 1920, upon proper request to this Court. 9 DATED this 9th day of September, 2019. 10 A 11 12 David W. Christel United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Presented by: s/ Stephen Dmetruk STEPHEN DMETRUK Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 Telephone: (206) 615-3725 Fax: (206) 615-2531 stephen.dmetruk@ssa.gov 21 22 23 Page 2 ORDER - [3:19-CV-5294-DWC]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?