Ewalan v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al

Filing 123

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 122 Motion to Object to Defendants Attempts to Dismiss Case. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Joseph Ewalan, Prisoner ID: 392824)(LH)

Download PDF
Case 3:20-cv-05678-JLR-TLF Document 123 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN, 11 v. 12 13 14 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C20-5678JLR-TLF ORDER WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants. 15 16 Before the court is Plaintiff Joseph Lochuch Ewalan’s motion to object to 17 Defendants Robert, Rothwell, Dickerson, Nikula, and Wakefield’s (collectively, 18 “Defendants”) attempts to dismiss his case. (Mot. (Dkt. # 122).) The court finds that no 19 response from Defendants is necessary. Mr. Ewalan neither articulates a claim for relief 20 in his motion nor responds to a motion by Defendants. (See id.; see also Dkt. 1) 21 22 1 To the extent Mr. Ewalan suspects that anything “is going on behind closed doors between Defendants and the court” (Mot. at 2), the court reminds Mr. Ewalan that the court will ORDER - 1 Case 3:20-cv-05678-JLR-TLF Document 123 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2 1 Accordingly, Mr. Ewalan’s motion to object to Defendants’ attempts to dismiss his case 2 is DENIED. 3 Dated this 21st day of November, 2022. 4 A 5 JAMES L. ROBART United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 not “initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications” from any party regarding this or any other litigation, except as expressly authorized by law, see Code of Conduct for United States Judges Canon 3(A)(4) (2019). The court assures Mr. Ewalan that there have been no discussions between Defendants and the court without Mr. Ewalan. ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?