Ewalan v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
Filing
123
ORDER denying Plaintiff's 122 Motion to Object to Defendants Attempts to Dismiss Case. Signed by Judge James L. Robart. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Joseph Ewalan, Prisoner ID: 392824)(LH)
Case 3:20-cv-05678-JLR-TLF Document 123 Filed 11/21/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN,
11
v.
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
CASE NO. C20-5678JLR-TLF
ORDER
WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
Before the court is Plaintiff Joseph Lochuch Ewalan’s motion to object to
17
Defendants Robert, Rothwell, Dickerson, Nikula, and Wakefield’s (collectively,
18
“Defendants”) attempts to dismiss his case. (Mot. (Dkt. # 122).) The court finds that no
19
response from Defendants is necessary. Mr. Ewalan neither articulates a claim for relief
20
in his motion nor responds to a motion by Defendants. (See id.; see also Dkt. 1)
21
22
1
To the extent Mr. Ewalan suspects that anything “is going on behind closed doors
between Defendants and the court” (Mot. at 2), the court reminds Mr. Ewalan that the court will
ORDER - 1
Case 3:20-cv-05678-JLR-TLF Document 123 Filed 11/21/22 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly, Mr. Ewalan’s motion to object to Defendants’ attempts to dismiss his case
2
is DENIED.
3
Dated this 21st day of November, 2022.
4
A
5
JAMES L. ROBART
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
not “initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications” from any party regarding this or any
other litigation, except as expressly authorized by law, see Code of Conduct for United States
Judges Canon 3(A)(4) (2019). The court assures Mr. Ewalan that there have been no discussions
between Defendants and the court without Mr. Ewalan.
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?