Smith v. Uttecht

Filing 12

ORDER re 11 Report and Recommendation. The Court ADOPTS in full the unopposed Report and Recommendation; Petitioner's motion to compel for information, docket no. 4 , and his motion for vicarious exhaustion, docket no. 5 , are DENIED; Peti tioner's federal habeas petition, docket no. 3 , and this action, are DISMISSED with prejudice; A certificate of appealability is DENIED in this case. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Zilly. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Edward Smith, Prisoner ID: 388890)(SR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 EDWARD BLAKE SMITH, 8 Petitioner, 9 10 11 C20-6240 TSZ v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; and JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, ORDER Respondents. 12 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation, 13 14 docket no. 11, of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura. Having reviewed the Report and 15 Recommendation, to which no objection was filed, Petitioner Edward Blake Smith’s 16 petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (docket no. 3), the 17 motion to compel for information or show cause (docket no. 4), the motion for vicarious 18 exhaustion (docket no. 5), and the remaining record, the Court enters the following 19 Order: 20 (1) The Court ADOPTS in full the unopposed Report and Recommendation, 21 docket no. 11; 22 23 ORDER - 1 1 (2) Petitioner’s motion to compel for information, docket no. 4, and his motion 2 for vicarious exhaustion, docket no. 5, are DENIED; 3 (3) Petitioner’s federal habeas petition, docket no. 3, and this action, are 4 DISMISSED with prejudice; 5 (4) A certificate of appealability is DENIED in this case; and 6 (5) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to Petitioner, who is pro 7 se, all counsel of record, and the Honorable J. Richard Creatura. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated this 27th day of April, 2021. 10 A 11 Thomas S. Zilly United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?