Becker et al v. Tig Insurance Company et al

Filing 155

ORDER granting Defendants' 128 Second Set of Motions in Limine. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB)

Case 3:21-cv-05185-JHC Document 155 Filed 01/18/23 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

6
7
8

MATTHEW BECKER, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

9
10
11

CASE NO. 3:21-cv-05185-JHC
ORDER

v.
TIG INSURANCE CO., et al.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant TIG Insurance Company’s Second Set

15

of Motions in Limine. Dkt. # 128. The Court has considered the material submitted in support

16

of the motion as well as the balance of the case file. Plaintiffs’ response was due yesterday, and

17

they did not file one. See LCR 7(d)(4). The Court rules as follows:

18

1. Motion re Evidence or Argument About the Breach of Contract Claim for Indemnity

19

(MOTION 8)

20

GRANTED.

21

2. Motion re Evidence or Argument About Negligence (MOTION 9)

22

GRANTED.

23
24
ORDER - 1

Case 3:21-cv-05185-JHC Document 155 Filed 01/18/23 Page 2 of 2

1

3. Motion re Evidence or Argument About Bad Faith Claims Relating to Gillaspy &

2

Rhode’s Services (MOTION 10)

3

GRANTED.

4

4. Motion re Evidence or Argument About Negligent Misrepresentation Claims

5

(MOTION 11)

6

GRANTED.

7

5. Motion re Evidence of Bad Faith With Respect to TIG’s November 15, 2018 Letter

8

(MOTION 12)

9

GRANTED.

10

6. Motion re Evidence That TIG’s Withdrawal of its Defense Was In Bad Faith

11

(MOTION 13)

12

GRANTED.

13

7. Motion re Evidence or Arguments Relating to Equitable Estoppel (MOTION 14)
GRANTED.

14
15

8. Motion re Evidence of Insurance Fair Conduct Act (“IFCA”) Claim (MOTION 15)
GRANTED.

16
17

Dated this 18th day of January, 2023.

18
John H. Chun
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER - 2