Sullivan v. Aurich et al
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 27 ) is GRANTED and the claims against defendants William Aurich and Eric Nelson are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is referred back to Judge Vaughn for all pretrial matters consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
5
6
7
BRANDON R. SULLIVAN,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
WILLIAM AURICH, et al.,
11
Cause No. C21-5433-RSL-SKV
ORDER ADOPTING
REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION
Defendants.
12
13
This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable
14
15 S. Kate Vaughn, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. # 67. Despite being granted an extension,
16
a continuance, and a stay (Dkt. # 72, 75, and 85), plaintiff has neither responded to the Report
17
18
and Recommendation nor filed a status report regarding his whereabouts and his access to his
19 legal materials. The stay expired on November 14, 2022. Having reviewed the record in the
20
above-captioned matter, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendants’ motion
21
22
for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 27) is GRANTED and the claims against defendants
23 William Aurich and Eric Nelson are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice.
23
25
26
//
27
28
//
ORDER - 1
1
2
This case is referred back to Judge Vaughn for all pretrial matters consistent with this
Order.
3
4
5
Dated this 18th day of November, 2022.
6
7
Robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
23
25
26
27
28
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?