Sullivan v. Aurich et al

Filing 86

ORDER ADOPTING 67 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 27 ) is GRANTED and the claims against defendants William Aurich and Eric Nelson are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. This case is referred back to Judge Vaughn for all pretrial matters consistent with this Order. Signed by Judge Robert S. Lasnik. (LH) (cc: Plaintiff via US mail)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 5 6 7 BRANDON R. SULLIVAN, 8 Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 WILLIAM AURICH, et al., 11 Cause No. C21-5433-RSL-SKV ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. 12 13 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable 14 15 S. Kate Vaughn, United States Magistrate Judge. Dkt. # 67. Despite being granted an extension, 16 a continuance, and a stay (Dkt. # 72, 75, and 85), plaintiff has neither responded to the Report 17 18 and Recommendation nor filed a status report regarding his whereabouts and his access to his 19 legal materials. The stay expired on November 14, 2022. Having reviewed the record in the 20 above-captioned matter, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Defendants’ motion 21 22 for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. # 27) is GRANTED and the claims against defendants 23 William Aurich and Eric Nelson are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. 23 25 26 // 27 28 // ORDER - 1 1 2 This case is referred back to Judge Vaughn for all pretrial matters consistent with this Order. 3 4 5 Dated this 18th day of November, 2022. 6 7 Robert S. Lasnik United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 23 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?