Creekview IP LLC v. Logitech Inc
Filing
6
MINUTE ORDER signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge; The Court DENIES #5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (TF)
Case 3:21-cv-05866-SKV Document 6 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
6
7
8
CREEKVIEW IP LLC,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
Case No. C21-5866-SKV
MINUTE ORDER
v.
LOGITECH INC.,
Defendant.
12
13
14
15
16
The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Hon. S. Kate
Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge:
On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to
17
File Answer, see Dkt. 5, in which Plaintiff indicated Defendant’s Answer was due on December
18
29, 2021. Per Plaintiff, the parties conferred regarding an extension to the Answer deadline, but
19
because Defendant has not yet appeared, Plaintiff moved for the extension. Id. Because Plaintiff
20
has not filed an affidavit of service in this case, the Court cannot determine whether Plaintiff has
21
effectuated service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant, or whether there is currently a
22
deadline for Defendant’s Answer. Plaintiff’s Motion, Dkt. 5, is therefore DENIED. Defendant
23
MINUTE ORDER - 1
Case 3:21-cv-05866-SKV Document 6 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2
1
may move for an extension of the Answer deadline, if necessary, following Plaintiff’s filing of
2
proof of service and Defendant’s appearance in this case.
3
Dated this 7th day of January, 2022.
4
Ravi Subramanian
Clerk of Court
5
By: Stefanie Prather
Deputy Clerk
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
MINUTE ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?