Creekview IP LLC v. Logitech Inc

Filing 6

MINUTE ORDER signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge; The Court DENIES 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer. (TF)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-cv-05866-SKV Document 6 Filed 01/07/22 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 6 7 8 CREEKVIEW IP LLC, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 Case No. C21-5866-SKV MINUTE ORDER v. LOGITECH INC., Defendant. 12 13 14 15 16 The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Hon. S. Kate Vaughan, United States Magistrate Judge: On December 27, 2021, Plaintiff filed an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to 17 File Answer, see Dkt. 5, in which Plaintiff indicated Defendant’s Answer was due on December 18 29, 2021. Per Plaintiff, the parties conferred regarding an extension to the Answer deadline, but 19 because Defendant has not yet appeared, Plaintiff moved for the extension. Id. Because Plaintiff 20 has not filed an affidavit of service in this case, the Court cannot determine whether Plaintiff has 21 effectuated service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendant, or whether there is currently a 22 deadline for Defendant’s Answer. Plaintiff’s Motion, Dkt. 5, is therefore DENIED. Defendant 23 MINUTE ORDER - 1 Case 3:21-cv-05866-SKV Document 6 Filed 01/07/22 Page 2 of 2 1 may move for an extension of the Answer deadline, if necessary, following Plaintiff’s filing of 2 proof of service and Defendant’s appearance in this case. 3 Dated this 7th day of January, 2022. 4 Ravi Subramanian Clerk of Court 5 By: Stefanie Prather Deputy Clerk 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 MINUTE ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?