United States of America v. Baker et al

Filing 8

ORDER granting 7 Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding, and that Rok Telecom 4, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to thisgarnishment, signed by Judge Benjamin H Settle.(AMD)

Download PDF
Case 3:21-mc-05019-BHS Document 8 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2 1 The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. EFRAIN DIAZ BAKER, 14 ROK TELECOM 4, LLC, Garnishee. 18 19 21 22 23 Order Terminating Garnishment Proceeding and 17 20 (3:15-CR-5545-001) Defendant/Judgment Debtor, 15 16 NO. 3:21-MC-05019-RSL This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(A). IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Rok 24 25 Telecom 4, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this 26 garnishment. 27 28 // ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Efrain Diaz Baker and Rok Telecom 4, LLC USDC#: 3:21-MC-05019RSL/3:15-CR-5545-1)1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970 Case 3:21-mc-05019-BHS Document 8 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2 1 DATED this day of , 2021. 2 3 4 5 ____________________________________________ ________________ _ __ BENJAMIN H. S SETTLE BENJAMIN ENJA UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE STATES 6 Presented by: 7 s/ Kyle A. Forsyth KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609 Assistant United States Attorney 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v. Efrain Diaz Baker and Rok Telecom 4, LLC USDC#: 3:21-MC-05019RSL/3:15-CR-5545-1)2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220 SEATTLE, WA 98101 PHONE: 206-553-7970

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?