United States of America v. Baker et al
Filing
8
ORDER granting 7 Application to Terminate Garnishment Proceeding, and that Rok Telecom 4, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to thisgarnishment, signed by Judge Benjamin H Settle.(AMD)
Case 3:21-mc-05019-BHS Document 8 Filed 11/18/21 Page 1 of 2
1
The Honorable Benjamin H. Settle
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
8
9
10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
EFRAIN DIAZ BAKER,
14
ROK TELECOM 4, LLC,
Garnishee.
18
19
21
22
23
Order Terminating
Garnishment Proceeding
and
17
20
(3:15-CR-5545-001)
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
15
16
NO. 3:21-MC-05019-RSL
This matter came before the Court on the United States’ Application to
Terminate Garnishment Proceeding. For the reasons stated in the United
States’ Application, the Court concludes that this Garnishment should be
terminated, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 3205(c)(10)(A).
IT IS ORDERED that the garnishment is terminated and that Rok
24
25
Telecom 4, LLC is relieved of further responsibility pursuant to this
26
garnishment.
27
28
//
ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v.
Efrain Diaz Baker and Rok Telecom 4, LLC USDC#: 3:21-MC-05019RSL/3:15-CR-5545-1)1
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Case 3:21-mc-05019-BHS Document 8 Filed 11/18/21 Page 2 of 2
1
DATED this
day of
, 2021.
2
3
4
5
____________________________________________
________________
_ __
BENJAMIN H. S
SETTLE
BENJAMIN
ENJA
UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
STATES
6
Presented by:
7
s/ Kyle A. Forsyth
KYLE A. FORSYTH, WSBA # 34609
Assistant United States Attorney
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER TERMINATING GARNISHMENT PROCEEDING (USA v.
Efrain Diaz Baker and Rok Telecom 4, LLC USDC#: 3:21-MC-05019RSL/3:15-CR-5545-1)2
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220
SEATTLE, WA 98101
PHONE: 206-553-7970
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?