Lumpkins v. Bennett
Filing
22
ORDER Appointing Counsel. The Court GRANTS Petitioner William Lumpkins' motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 20 . The Court APPOINTS Rylan L. S. Weythman, Foster Garvey PC, 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 3000, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 44 7-4400, rylan.weythman@foster.com, as pro bono counsel for Lumpkins. Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Appearance within 10 calendar days of this order. Signed by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(William Lumpkins, Prisoner ID: 386626) (KRA) (cc: Attorney Weythman and Pro Bono Coordinator via NEF)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WILLIAM W. LUMPKINS,
Petitioner,
CASE NO. 3:22-cv-5852
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL
v.
JASON BENNETT,
Respondent.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
The Court GRANTS Petitioner William Lumpkins’ motion for appointment of
counsel. Dkt. No. 20. The Court APPOINTS Rylan L. S. Weythman, Foster Garvey
PC, 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 3000, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 447-4400,
rylan.weythman@foster.com, as pro bono counsel for Lumpkins. The appointment is
made under the Plan of the United States District Court for the Western District of
Washington for the Representation of Pro Se Litigants in Civil Rights Actions. See
General Order No. 07-23 (Jan. 1, 2024), https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/sites/wawd/
files/General%20Order%2007-23%20-%20Amended%20Pro%20Bono%20Plan.pdf.
Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Appearance within 10 calendar days of
this order. If counsel cannot assume this representation for a reason contemplated
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - 1
1
by the Civil Rules, a motion for relief from appointment should immediately be filed
2
with the assigned judge.
3
Dated this 25th day of November, 2024.
4
A
5
Jamal N. Whitehead
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?