Lumpkins v. Bennett

Filing 22

ORDER Appointing Counsel. The Court GRANTS Petitioner William Lumpkins' motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 20 . The Court APPOINTS Rylan L. S. Weythman, Foster Garvey PC, 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 3000, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 44 7-4400, rylan.weythman@foster.com, as pro bono counsel for Lumpkins. Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Appearance within 10 calendar days of this order. Signed by Judge Jamal N Whitehead. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(William Lumpkins, Prisoner ID: 386626) (KRA) (cc: Attorney Weythman and Pro Bono Coordinator via NEF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 WILLIAM W. LUMPKINS, Petitioner, CASE NO. 3:22-cv-5852 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL v. JASON BENNETT, Respondent. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The Court GRANTS Petitioner William Lumpkins’ motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 20. The Court APPOINTS Rylan L. S. Weythman, Foster Garvey PC, 1111 3rd Avenue, Suite 3000, Seattle, Washington 98101, (206) 447-4400, rylan.weythman@foster.com, as pro bono counsel for Lumpkins. The appointment is made under the Plan of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington for the Representation of Pro Se Litigants in Civil Rights Actions. See General Order No. 07-23 (Jan. 1, 2024), https://www.wawd.uscourts.gov/sites/wawd/ files/General%20Order%2007-23%20-%20Amended%20Pro%20Bono%20Plan.pdf. Counsel is directed to file a Notice of Appearance within 10 calendar days of this order. If counsel cannot assume this representation for a reason contemplated ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - 1 1 by the Civil Rules, a motion for relief from appointment should immediately be filed 2 with the assigned judge. 3 Dated this 25th day of November, 2024. 4 A 5 Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?