Perez v Strange et al

Filing 91

ORDER OF DISMISSAL re Parties' 89 Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal. Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ's claims against the Defendants in the above-referenced cause of action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own legal fees and costs. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (KRA)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 DANIEL JAY PEREZ, 10 11 12 13 NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. CHERYL STRANGE, et al, Defendants. STIPULATION 14 15 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, DANIEL 16 JAY PEREZ, by and through his attorney of record, DARRYL PARKER, and Defendants by 17 and through their attorneys of record, ROBERT W. FERGUSON, Attorney General, 18 MICHELLE YOUNG, Assistant Attorney General, that the parties to this action agree to the 19 dismissal of the Defendants with prejudice, in the above-entitled action. 20 DATED this 8th day of May, 2024 21 22 23 24 s/ Michelle Young MICHELLE YOUNG, WSBA #52423 Assistant Attorney General Attorney for Defendants s/ Darryl Paker DARRYL PARKER, WSBA #30770 Civil Rights Justice Center, PLLC Attorney for Plaintiff 25 26 STIPULATION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV 1 1 ORDER 2 THIS MATTER having come before this Court on the stipulation of the parties 3 requesting a dismissal of Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ’S claims against the Defendants (Dkt. # 4 89), and the Court having been advised in the premises, now, therefore, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ’s claims against the 6 Defendants in the above-referenced cause of action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. 7 Each party shall bear their own legal fees and costs. 8 DATED this 8th day of May, 2024. 9 10 John H. Chun U.S. District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION & ORDER OF DISMISSAL NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?