Perez v Strange et al
Filing
91
ORDER OF DISMISSAL re Parties' 89 Stipulation and Proposed Order of Dismissal. Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ's claims against the Defendants in the above-referenced cause of action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own legal fees and costs. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (KRA)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
8
9
DANIEL JAY PEREZ,
10
11
12
13
NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
v.
CHERYL STRANGE, et al,
Defendants.
STIPULATION
14
15
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, DANIEL
16
JAY PEREZ, by and through his attorney of record, DARRYL PARKER, and Defendants by
17
and through their attorneys of record, ROBERT W. FERGUSON, Attorney General,
18
MICHELLE YOUNG, Assistant Attorney General, that the parties to this action agree to the
19
dismissal of the Defendants with prejudice, in the above-entitled action.
20
DATED this 8th day of May, 2024
21
22
23
24
s/ Michelle Young
MICHELLE YOUNG, WSBA #52423
Assistant Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
s/ Darryl Paker
DARRYL PARKER, WSBA #30770
Civil Rights Justice Center, PLLC
Attorney for Plaintiff
25
26
STIPULATION & ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV
1
1
ORDER
2
THIS MATTER having come before this Court on the stipulation of the parties
3
requesting a dismissal of Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ’S claims against the Defendants (Dkt. #
4
89), and the Court having been advised in the premises, now, therefore,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff DANIEL J. PEREZ’s claims against the
6
Defendants in the above-referenced cause of action, are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
7
Each party shall bear their own legal fees and costs.
8
DATED this 8th day of May, 2024.
9
10
John H. Chun
U.S. District Court Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
STIPULATION & ORDER OF
DISMISSAL
NO. 3:23-cv-05008-JHC-SKV
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?