Hodge v. Marshall et al

Filing 7

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Dkt. 6 ). Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. 1 ) is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by U.S. District Judge David G Estudillo. (AMD) (cc: Pltf via USPS)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

TYQUEZ HODGE,
v.

CASE NO. 3:23-cv-05927-DGE
Plaintiff,

NATASHA MARSHALL et al.,

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO.
6)

Defendant.

15
16

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable

17

David W. Christel, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. No. 6.) Plaintiff filed no

18

objections. Having de novo reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the proposed amended

19

complaint (Dkt. No. 4), and the remainder of the record, the Court ORDERS the following:

20

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

21

2. Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the

22
23

case is DISMISSED without prejudice;
3. The Clerk shall enter JUDGMENT and close this case; and

24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 6) - 1

1

4. Copies of this order shall be sent to all parties and Judge Christel.

2

Dated this 26th day of March 202

3
4
5

A

David G. Estudillo
United States District Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 6) - 2