Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Hon. S. Kate Vaughan, re: the parties' Stipulated 14 Motion to Remand. (TF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
MINDEE DEANN JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
[PROPOSED] ORDER
vs.
14
15
Case No. C23-5976-SKV
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
16
Defendant.
17
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulated motion, the Court hereby ORDERS that this matter is
18
remanded to the Commissioner under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (fourth sentence), for further
19
administrative proceedings. On remand, the administrative law judge will reevaluate the medical
20
opinion evidence, including the prior administrative medical findings from the State agency
21
psychological consultants; reevaluate the residual functional capacity; continue with the
22
sequential evaluation process, to include obtaining vocational expert testimony, as necessary;
23
and offer the claimant the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the
24
administrative record resolving the above issue, and issue a new decision.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
Page 1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
C23-5976-SKV
1
2
After judgment, Plaintiff may be entitled to reasonable attorney’s fees and costs pursuant
to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court.
3
4
DATED this 26th day of March, 2024.
A
5
6
S. KATE VAUGHAN
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Presented by:
s/ Sarah Moum
Sarah Moum
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Tel: (206) 615-2936
Email: sarah.moum@ssa.gov
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
C23-5976-SKV
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?