Lawson v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Hon. Michelle L. Peterson, re the parties' 14 Motion to Remand. (TF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
TACOMA DIVISION
8
9
10
JENNIFER LAWSON,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
Civil No. 3:24-CV-05018-MLP
ORDER
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
14
Defendant.
15
Based on the parties’ agreement and stipulation, and good cause shown, it is hereby
16
17
ORDERED as follows:
1.
Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the above-captioned case is reverse d and
18
remanded to the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative
19
proceedings and a new decision with respect to Plaintiff Jennifer Lawson’s applications for
20
Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, respectively.
21
2.
On remand, the administrative law judge (ALJ) shall:
a. Reassess the medical opinions and prior administrative medical finding, including
22
the opinion of William R. Wilkinson, EdD;
23
24
Page 1
ORDER - [3:24-CV-05018-MLP]
1
b. As necessary, reassess the claimant’s residual functional capacity, the step-four
2
finding, and step-five finding; and
3
c. Offer the claimant the opportunity for a hearing, take further action to complete the
4
5
administrative record resolving the above issues, and issue a new decision.
3.
6
Plaintiff shall be entitled to move for reasonable attorney fees and costs, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
7
DATED this 9th day of May, 2024.
8
A
9
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
Presented by:
14
s/ Lars J. Nelson
LARS J. NELSON
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of Program Litigation, Office 7
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore, MD 21235
Telephone: (206) 615-3717
Fax: (206) 615-2531
lars.nelson@ssa.gov
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Page 2
ORDER - [3:24-CV-05018-MLP]
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?