Zayas v. Enslee

Filing 4

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. However, based on the allegations in the proposed Complaint, it does not appear Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of a summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 5 6 7 8 9 MYRIAM ZAYAS, v. Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ROBERT ENSLEE, 10 CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05346-TL Defendant. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405 filing fee, Plaintiff financially qualifies for In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff’s IFP application (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. However, based on the allegations in the proposed Complaint, it does not appear Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of a summons. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the District Judge assigned to this case. Dated this 10th day of May, 2024. A Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge 24 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?