Zayas v. Enslee

Filing 4

ORDER granting Plaintiff's #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. However, based on the allegations in the proposed Complaint, it does not appear Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance of a summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA

5
6
7
8
9

MYRIAM ZAYAS,
v.

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN
FORMA PAUPERIS

ROBERT ENSLEE,

10

CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05346-TL

Defendant.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Because Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405 filing fee,
Plaintiff financially qualifies for In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(1). Therefore, Plaintiff’s IFP application (Dkt. 1) is GRANTED. However, based on the
allegations in the proposed Complaint, it does not appear Plaintiff has adequately stated a claim.
Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) before issuance
of a summons.
The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and to the
District Judge assigned to this case.
Dated this 10th day of May, 2024.

A

Grady J. Leupold
United States Magistrate Judge

24
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1