Adams v. Inslee et al

Filing 4

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Plaintiff is now ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why his case should not be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff fails to respond to the Courts Order on or before July 17, 2024, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Grady J Leupold. **2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Ryan Adams, Prisoner ID: 415205)(MW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 8 9 10 11 12 13 RYAN SCOTT ADAMS, v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 3:24-cv-05417-TMC-GJL ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE JAY INSLEE, et al., Defendants. 14 15 The District Court has referred this pro se prisoner action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 16 1983 to United States Magistrate Judge Grady J. Leupold. Plaintiff Ryan Scott Adams, 17 proceeding pro se, commenced this action on May 30, 2024. Dkt. 1. Upon receipt of Plaintiff’s 18 Proposed Complaint, the Clerk of Court notified Plaintiff that his filings were deficient because 19 he had not paid the $405.00 filing fee or applied to proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. 20 With this Deficiency Notice, the Clerk of Court included a copy of an application to proceed IFP 21 and informed Plaintiff that he had until July 1, 2024, to correct his filing deficiency and proceed 22 in this action. Id. 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1 1 The deadline for Plaintiff to pay the filing fee or apply to proceed IFP has now elapsed 2 with nothing filed by him. Accordingly, Plaintiff is now ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why 3 his case should not be DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. If Plaintiff fails to respond to the 4 Court’s Order on or before July 17, 2024, the Court will recommend dismissal of this action 5 without prejudice for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with a Court Order. 6 Dated this 3rd day of July, 2024. 7 A 8 Grady J. Leupold United States Magistrate Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 -2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?