Shams et al v. Blinken et al

Filing 3

ORDER. The Court orders Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE within ten (10) days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Rule 4(m). If Plaintiffs do not demonstrate good cause for the failure, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. Signed by Judge John H. Chun. (SB) (cc: Plaintiffs via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 9 10 STEPHANIE SHAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, 11 12 CASE NO. C24-5446JHC ORDER v. ANTONY BLINKEN, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 requires a plaintiff to serve the defendant with a 16 summons and a copy of the plaintiff’s complaint and sets forth the specific requirements 17 for doing so. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Rule 4(m), which provides the timeframe in which 18 service must be effectuated, states in relevant part: 19 20 21 If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court—on motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff—must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period. 22 ORDER - 1 1 Id. Here, Plaintiffs have failed to serve Defendants with a summons and a copy of 2 Plaintiffs’ complaint within the timeframe provided in Rule 4(m). 3 Accordingly, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to SHOW CAUSE within ten (10) 4 days of the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed for failure to 5 comply with Rule 4(m). If Plaintiffs do not demonstrate good cause for the failure, the 6 Court will dismiss the action without prejudice. 7 Dated this 24th day of September, 2024. 8 A 9 10 The Honorable John H. Chun United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?