Raikoglo v. United States of America et al

Filing 4

ORDER granting Plaintiff's 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. However, based on the allegations in the complaint, it does not appear plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Signed by Judge Theresa L Fricke.(MW) (cc: Plaintiff via USPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 4 5 6 LANCE RAIKOGLO, 7 8 9 v. U.S. GOVERNMENT, et al., 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Defendant. 10 11 Plaintiff, Case No. 3:24-cv-5494-JLR Because plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $405.00 filing fee, plaintiff financially qualifies for in forma pauperis (IFP) status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Therefore. Plaintiff’s IFP application is GRANTED. However, based on the allegations in the complaint, it does not appear plaintiff has adequately stated a claim. Therefore, the undersigned recommends review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Dated this 5th day of July, 2024. 20 A 21 Theresa L. Fricke United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?