Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez

Filing 30

ORDER granting Parties' 29 Stipulated Motion for Relief from a Deadline. The deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order is reset to 12/3/2024. If the parties wish to have a status conference with the Court at any time during the pendency of this action, they should notify Diyana Staples, Courtroom Deputy, at [e-mail]. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13

RUBEN PAZ GOMEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A
DEADLINE

YANISLEIDY REYES GONZALEZ,
Defendant.

14
15

Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE

THIS MATTER came before this Court on Plaintiff Ruben Paz Gomez and Defendant

16

Yanisleidy Reyes Gonzalez’ Stipulated Motion for Relief from a Deadline (“Motion”), and

17

being fully advised on the matter, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion (Dkt. No. 29) as

18

follows:

19

1. The Parties are relieved of the deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order on

20

November 26, 2024 pursuant to the Court’s Order Appointing Counsel and Order for

21

Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (“Order”). Dkt. 27.

22

2. The deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order is reset to December 3, 2024.

23

3. The joint proposed scheduling order will be used to set a schedule for the prompt

24

resolution of the petition. It must contain the parties’ views, proposals, and

25

agreements, by corresponding paragraph letters (A, B, etc.), on the following topics:

26

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 1
Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE

1
2
3
4
5
6

A. Whether and to what extent the parties anticipate engaging in discovery and
the date by which discovery will be completed.
B. Whether the parties intend pursue resolution through mediation and the date by
which any mediation will occur.
C. The total number of hours the parties anticipate needing for the evidentiary
hearing.

7

D. The number of witnesses each party intends to have testify at the hearing and

8

confirmation that all witnesses will be able and available to participate

9

remotely via Zoom; and

10
11

E. Whether either party or any party’s witnesses will require the services of an
interpreter and if so, in what language.

12

F. Any suggestions for shortening or simplifying the case.

13

G. Any dates on which the parties or counsel may have conflicts or other

14
15

complications to be considered in setting a hearing date.
H. The date the petition will be ready for an evidentiary hearing on the merits and

16

all related due dates (disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, prehearing

17

statements, motions in limine, stipulations, etc.).

18
19

4. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Proposed Order, they may answer
in separate paragraphs. No separate proposals are to be filed.

20

5. If the parties wish to have a status conference with the Court at any time during the

21

pendency of this action, they should notify Diyana Staples, Courtroom Deputy, at

22

[e-mail].

23
24
25
26

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 2
Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

DATED this 25th day of November, 2024.

3
4
5
6
7

A
Kymberly K. Evanson
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 3
Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE