Paz Gomez v. Reyes Gonzalez

Filing 30

ORDER granting Parties' 29 Stipulated Motion for Relief from a Deadline. The deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order is reset to 12/3/2024. If the parties wish to have a status conference with the Court at any time during the pendency of this action, they should notify Diyana Staples, Courtroom Deputy, at Diyana_Staples@wawd.uscourts.gov. Signed by District Judge Kymberly K. Evanson. (SB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 RUBEN PAZ GOMEZ, Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE YANISLEIDY REYES GONZALEZ, Defendant. 14 15 Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE THIS MATTER came before this Court on Plaintiff Ruben Paz Gomez and Defendant 16 Yanisleidy Reyes Gonzalez’ Stipulated Motion for Relief from a Deadline (“Motion”), and 17 being fully advised on the matter, the Court hereby GRANTS the Motion (Dkt. No. 29) as 18 follows: 19 1. The Parties are relieved of the deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order on 20 November 26, 2024 pursuant to the Court’s Order Appointing Counsel and Order for 21 Joint Proposed Scheduling Order (“Order”). Dkt. 27. 22 2. The deadline to file a joint proposed scheduling order is reset to December 3, 2024. 23 3. The joint proposed scheduling order will be used to set a schedule for the prompt 24 resolution of the petition. It must contain the parties’ views, proposals, and 25 agreements, by corresponding paragraph letters (A, B, etc.), on the following topics: 26 ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 1 Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE 1 2 3 4 5 6 A. Whether and to what extent the parties anticipate engaging in discovery and the date by which discovery will be completed. B. Whether the parties intend pursue resolution through mediation and the date by which any mediation will occur. C. The total number of hours the parties anticipate needing for the evidentiary hearing. 7 D. The number of witnesses each party intends to have testify at the hearing and 8 confirmation that all witnesses will be able and available to participate 9 remotely via Zoom; and 10 11 E. Whether either party or any party’s witnesses will require the services of an interpreter and if so, in what language. 12 F. Any suggestions for shortening or simplifying the case. 13 G. Any dates on which the parties or counsel may have conflicts or other 14 15 complications to be considered in setting a hearing date. H. The date the petition will be ready for an evidentiary hearing on the merits and 16 all related due dates (disclosure of witnesses and exhibits, prehearing 17 statements, motions in limine, stipulations, etc.). 18 19 4. If the parties are unable to agree on any part of the Proposed Order, they may answer in separate paragraphs. No separate proposals are to be filed. 20 5. If the parties wish to have a status conference with the Court at any time during the 21 pendency of this action, they should notify Diyana Staples, Courtroom Deputy, at 22 Diyana_Staples@wawd.uscourts.gov. 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 2 Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 DATED this 25th day of November, 2024. 3 4 5 6 7 A Kymberly K. Evanson United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDER GRANTING RELIEF FROM A DEADLINE - 3 Case No. 3:24-cv-5645-KKE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?