Knockfierna LLC v. City of Shelton et al

Filing 17

ORDER re Parties' 16 Stipulation. The Court, finding good cause, hereby ADOPTS the following briefing schedule and ORDERS that, if the case survives summary judgment, the parties shall submit a joint status report recommending discovery and tr ial-related deadlines. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment due by 3/14/2025, Defendant's response brief and cross motion due 4/4/2025, Plaintiff's omnibus response brief and reply brief due 4/11/2025, Defendants reply brief due 4/18/2025. Signed by Judge Barbara J. Rothstein. (MJV)

1

The Honorable Barbara J. Rothstein

2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

8
9

KNOCKFIERNA, LLC,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SHELTON,

13
Defendant.
14
15
16

No. 3:24-cv-05873
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND
MODIFYING DISCOVERY
DEADLINES

I. INTRODUCTION
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred on more than one occasion about the nature and

17
posture of the case; and
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

WHEREAS, the parties believe this case is subject to a number of gateway legal issues,
which do not require substantial discovery; and
WHEREAS, the parties desire to efficiently adjudicate this case in a manner that
minimizes needless costs and delay; and
WHEREAS, the parties also desire to minimize redundant and unhelpful briefing which
are often attendant to cross-motions; and

25
26

WHEREAS, the parties have crafted a summary judgment briefing schedule that differs
from the Court’s standing order, which they are now submitting for the Court’s consideration.
ORDER
(3:24-cv-05873) - 1

K E L L E R R O H R B A C K L. L .P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, WA 98101 -3268
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]

1

II. STIPULATION

2

The parties hereby stipulate to the following summary judgment briefing schedule:

3

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

March 14, 2025

DEFENDANT’S OMNIBUS RESPONSE
BRIEF AND CROSS-MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT

April 4, 2025

April 11, 2025

8

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE OMNIBUS
RESPONSE BRIEF AND REPLY BRIEF

9

DEFENDANT’S REPLY BRIEF

April 18, 2025

4
5
6
7

10
11
12

The parties further stipulate that, following the Court’s ruling on the summary judgment
cross-motions, if the case is not dismissed, they shall confer and submit a joint status report

13
14
15
16

recommending discovery and trial-related deadlines.
SO STIPULATED.
KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.

17
18
19
20

By s/ Adam L. Rosenberg
Adam L. Rosenberg, WSBA #39256
Attorneys for Defendant

MAYNARD LAW, PLLC

21
22
23

By s/ Jackson Maynard, Jr.
Jackson Maynard, Jr., WSBA #43481
Attorneys for Plaintiff

24
25
26
ORDER
(3:24-cv-05873) - 2

K E L L E R R O H R B A C K L. L .P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, WA 98101 -3268
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]

1

III. ORDER

2

The Court, finding good cause, hereby ADOPTS the above briefing schedule and

3
4

ORDERS that, if the case survives summary judgment, the parties shall submit a joint status
report recommending discovery and trial-related deadlines.

5
SO ORDERED.
6
7
8

DONE this 12th day of March 2025.
OrderSig

9

A

10
11

JUDGE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN

12
13
14
15
16
17

Presented by:
KELLER ROHRBACK L.L.P.
By s/ Adam L. Rosenberg
Adam L. Rosenberg, WSBA #39256
Attorneys for Defendant

18
19

MAYNARD LAW, PLLC

20
21
22

By s/ Jackson Maynard, Jr.
Jackson Maynard, Jr., WSBA #43481
Attorneys for Plaintiff

23
24
4910-3330-1795, v. 3

25
26
ORDER
(3:24-cv-05873) - 3

K E L L E R R O H R B A C K L. L .P.
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3400
Seattle, WA 98101 -3268
TELEPHONE: [phone]
FACSIMILE: [phone]