Woodward v. Speer
Filing
7
ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Judge Richard A. Jones. This action is duplicative of another federal habeas action currently pending in this Court. See Woodward v. Bennett, No. 3:24-cv-05442-BJR (W.D. Wash. filed Jun. 5, 2024). It is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice. Petitioners Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 1) and his other Proposed Motions and Requests (Dkts. 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7) are DENIED as moot. A certificate of appealability is denied in this case.**2 PAGE(S), PRINT ALL**(Robert Woodward, Prisoner ID: 357466) (CR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT TACOMA
7
8
ROBERT WOODWARD,
9
v.
10
11
Petitioner,
14
15
16
17
Respondent.
The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Grady
J. Leupold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does
hereby find and ORDER:
(1)
The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.
(2)
This action is duplicative of another federal habeas action currently pending in
this Court. See Woodward v. Bennett, No. 3:24-cv-05442-BJR (W.D. Wash. filed
Jun. 5, 2024). It is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice.
(3)
Petitioner’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 1) and his other
Proposed Motions and Requests (Dkts. 1-3, 1-4, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7) are DENIED as
moot.
(4)
A certificate of appealability is denied in this case.
18
19
20
21
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION
SCOTT SPEER,
12
13
CASE NO. 3:24-cv-06052-RAJ-GJL
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
(5)
The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the Hon.
Grady J. Leupold.
DATED this 27th day of January, 2025.
A
The Honorable Richard A. Jones
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?