Cruz v. USA

Filing 18

ORDER adopting 16 Report and Recommendations and denying 1 MOTION to Vacate filed by Richard Cruz. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 3/16/11. (Copy PS Petitioner via cert. mail)(mh)

Download PDF
Cruz v. USA Doc. 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA RICHARD CRUZ, Petitioner, v. // CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09CV60 CRIM. ACTION NO. 1:07CR68 (Judge Keeley) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. 16) AND DISMISSING 28 U.S.C. § 2255 PETITION WITH PREJUDICE On November 1, 2010, the Honorable David J. Joel, United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), concluding that this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition filed by the pro se petitioner, Richard Cruz, should be dismissed with prejudice because of a valid waiver of habeas rights contained in Cruz's plea agreement. Cruz filed no objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (dkt. 16) in its entirety, DENIES the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and DISMISSES this case WITH PREJUDICE. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because Cruz raises no colorable claim of denial of a constitutional right. It is so ORDERED. The Court directs the Clerk to prepare a separate judgment order and to transmit copies of both orders to counsel of record and to the pro se petitioner via certified mail, return receipt requested. DATED: March 16, 2011. /s/ Irene M. Keeley IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?