Brown et al v. Partipilo et al
ORDER granting 58 Motion for Leave to File Reply. The Clerk is directed to file the Reply, which counsel for Plaintiffs attached to the Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 3/10/2011. (kd)
-JSK Brown et al v. Partipilo et al
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA LAEL BROWN, LAVERNE WRIGHT-OCHOA, CHARLES BROWNE, AND ROBERT WRIGHT, Plaintiffs, vs. ANTHONY PARTIPILO, TODD TERRY, and AMERICA'S CRIMINAL DEFENSE GROUP, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION, Defendants. ORDER/OPINION On the 9th day of March 2011, Plaintiffs filed their "Motion to File Reply" [Docket Entry 58]. Defendants have not yet filed a response to the Motion nor was any response due at the time of this Order. For reasons appearing to the Court, Plaintiffs' Motion to File Reply is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to file the Reply, which counsel for Plaintiffs attached to the Motion. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 1:10cv110
It is so ORDERED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record.
DATED: March 10, 2011.
John S. Kaull
JOHN S. KAULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?