Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. v. THF Clarksburg Development Two Limited Liability Company
Filing
184
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, DENIED as MOOT as to 172 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull on 11/19/2013. (Copy counsel of record via CM/ECF)(jmm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
LOWE’S HOME CENTERS, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 1:12 cv 72
THF CLARKSBURG DEVELOPMENT TWO,
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY and
MICHAEL H. STAENBERG,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Before the Court is Plaintiff Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.’s (“Lowe’s”) “Motion to Compel
the Production of Floor Level Survey Data Considered by Defendants’ Testifying Experts ” filed on
October 23, 2013 [DE 172] and THF Clarksburg Development Two, Limited Liability Company’s”
(“THF”) Response filed on November 6, 2013 [DE 178]. No Reply was filed.
In its Response, THF advised that on October 23, 2013, it filed and served a Second
Supplemental Rule 26(a)(2)(B) disclosure, wherein it attached a disk containing the floor level
survey data of Allegheny Surveys, Inc., which had been provided to Defendants’ expert witnesses.
In light of this Response, the Court inquired of both parties via email whether the motion to compel
was rendered moot by the supplemental disclosure. Defendants responded via email that they
believed the motion was rendered moot. Plaintiffs responded, also via email, as follows:
During a telephone conference today, Defendants’ counsel confirmed that they will
not object to Plaintiff conducting follow-up depositions of Defendants’ experts,
Stephen Conner and Patrick Gallagher, for the limited purpose of questioning them
about the floor level survey results Defendants recently produced.
Based on that agreement, Plaintiff agrees that its Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 172)
is now moot.
Upon consideration of all which, Plaintiff Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc.’s (“Lowe’s”) “Motion
to Compel the Production of Floor Level Survey Data Considered by Defendants’ Testifying
Experts” [DE 172] is DENIED as MOOT.
It is so ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to provide notice of electronic filing of this order to counsel of record.
Dated: November 19, 2013
John S. Kaull
JOHN S. KAULL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?