Long v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 27 OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Neil Gifford Long; denying 25 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Commissioner of Social Security. The Court R EVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this civil action for an award of benefits; and DISMISSES this civil action and ORDERS it RETIRED from the docket of this Court. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a separate judgment order. Signed by District Judge Irene M. Keeley on 12/11/2014. (kd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA NEIL GIFFORD LONG, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14CV31 (Judge Keeley) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S OPINION/REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(B), Rule 72(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Court Rule 4.01(d), on February 24, 2014, the Court referred this Social Security action to United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble with directions to submit proposed findings of fact and a recommendation for disposition. On November 6, 2014, Magistrate Judge Trumble filed his Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), and directed the parties, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1) and Rule 6(e), Fed. R. Civ. P., to file with the Clerk of Court any written objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the R&R. He further directed that failure to file objections would result in a waiver of the right to appeal from the judgment of this Court. The parties did not file any objections. Upon consideration of Magistrate Judge Trumble's recommendation and having received no written objections,1 1 the The parties’ failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives their appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a LONG V. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 1:14CV31 ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Court accepts and approves the R&R and ORDERS this civil action disposed of in accordance with the recommendation of the magistrate judge. 1. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the plaintiff's motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. no. 24); 2. DENIES the Commissioner's motion for Summary Judgment (dkt. no. 25); 3. REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner and REMANDS this civil action for an award of benefits; and 4. DISMISSES this civil action and ORDERS it RETIRED from the docket of this Court. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 58, the Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a separate judgment order and to transmit copies of this Order to counsel of record. DATED: December 11, 2014. /s/ Irene M. Keeley IRENE M. KEELEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE de novo review of the issues presented. See Wells v. Shriners th Hospital, 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4 Cir. 1997); Thomas v. Arn,474 U.S. 140,148-153 (1985). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?