Boles v. The United States of Amercia
Filing
9
PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Senior Judge Irene M. Keeley on 7/13/2020. (copy counsel of record)(jmm)
Case 1:20-cv-00041-IMK Document 9 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 43
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BETTY BOLES, as Administratrix of the Estate of
KHAALID SHARIF FREDERICK,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civil Action No. 1:20-CV-41
(Keeley)
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
PROTECTIVE ORDER
By signing this Protective Order, the parties have agreed to be bound by its terms and to
request its entry by the presiding Judge. It is hereby ORDERED as follows:
I.
DISCOVERY PHASE
A.
If a party or an attorney for a party has a good faith belief that certain documents
or other materials (including digital information) subject to disclosure pursuant to a discovery or
other request, are confidential and should not be disclosed other than in connection with this
action and pursuant to this Protective Order, the party or attorney shall mark each such document
or other material as “CONFIDENTIAL.”
B.
If a party or an attorney for a party disputes whether a document or other material
should be marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” the parties and/or attorneys shall attempt to resolve the
dispute between themselves. If they are unsuccessful, the party or attorney challenging the
“CONFIDENTIAL” designation shall do so by filing an appropriate motion.
C.
No party or attorney or other person subject to this Protective Order shall
1
Case 1:20-cv-00041-IMK Document 9 Filed 07/13/20 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 44
distribute, transmit, or otherwise divulge any document or other material which
is marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” or the contents thereof, except in accordance with this
Protective Order. Court personnel are not subject to this Protective Order while engaged in the
performance of their official duties.
D.
Any document or other material which is marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” or the
contents thereof, may be used by a party, or a party’s attorney, expert witness, consultant, or
other person to whom disclosure is made, only for the purpose of this action. Nothing contained
in this Protective Order shall prevent the use of any document or other material which is marked
“CONFIDENTIAL,” or the contents thereof, at any discovery deposition taken in this action.
E.
If a party or attorney wishes to disclose any document or other material which is
marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” or the contents thereof, to any person actively engaged in working
on this action (e.g., expert witness, paralegal, associate, consultant), the person making the
disclosure shall do the following:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Provide a copy of this Protective Order to the person to whom disclosure
is made;
Inform the person to whom disclosure is made that s/he is bound by this
Protective Order;
Require the person to whom disclosure is made to sign an
acknowledgment and receipt of this Protective Order;
Instruct the person to whom disclosure is made to return any document
or other material which is marked “CONFIDENTIAL,” at the conclusion
of the case, including notes or memoranda made from
“CONFIDENTIAL” material;
Maintain a list of persons to whom disclosure was made and the
“CONFIDENTIAL” materials which were disclosed to that person; and
At the conclusion of the action, gather the “CONFIDENTIAL”
materials, copies thereof, and related notes and memoranda, and return
them to the party or attorney who originally disclosed them, with a
certificate of compliance with the terms of this Protective Order.
2
Case 1:20-cv-00041-IMK Document 9 Filed 07/13/20 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 45
F.
In the event a party learns or discovers that a document subject to protection from
disclosure on the basis of attorney-client privilege, work product, or other valid basis has
been produced inadvertently, counsel shall notify the receiving party within thirty (30) days
after such inadvertent production is discovered. Thereafter, such inadvertently disclosed
documents and all copies thereof shall be returned to the producing party and the receiving party
shall not, without good cause shown, seek an order compelling production of the inadvertently
disclosed documents on the ground that the producing party has waived or is otherwise estopped
from asserting the applicable privilege or immunity on the basis of the inadvertent production.
Such inadvertent disclosure shall not result in the waiver of any associated privilege, provided
that the producing party has given timely notice as provided in this paragraph. Counsel shall
cooperate, to the extent reasonably feasible, to restore the confidentiality of any such
inadvertently produced information.
II.
POST-DISCOVERY PHASE
If any party or attorney wishes to file, or use as an exhibit or as evidence at a hearing or trial,
any “CONFIDENTIAL” document or material, s/he must provide reasonable notice to the party
that produced the document or material. The parties and/or attorneys shall then attempt to resolve
the matter of continued confidentiality by either (a) removing the “CONFIDENTIAL” marking,
or (b) creating a mutually acceptable redacted version that suffices for purposes of the case. If an
amicable resolution proves unsuccessful, the parties and/or attorneys may present the issue to the
court for resolution. The proponent of continued confidentiality will have the burden of persuasion
that the document or material should be withheld from the public record.
3
Case 1:20-cv-00041-IMK Document 9 Filed 07/13/20 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 46
The Clerk is directed to send certified copies of this Order to all counsel of record.
July
Enter this _________ day of _____________________, 2020.
13th
_______________________________
The Honorable Irene M. Keeley
United States District Judge
Submitted by:
/s/ Russell A. Williams
Russell A. Williams
WV State Bar #12710
Katz, Kantor, Stonestreet & Buckner, PLLC
112 Capitol Street, Suite 200
Charleston, WV 25301
Counsel for Plaintiff
/s/ Christopher J. Prezioso
Christopher J. Prezioso
WV State Bar # 9384
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
P.O. Box 591
1125 Chapline Street, Suite 3000
Wheeling, WV 26003
Counsel for Defendant
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?