Hughes et al v. Consolidation Coal Company
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 10 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint. Clerk is directed to file the amended complaint. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 8/17/11. (cc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
MICHAEL HUGHES, AMY HUGHES,
KEVIN KIMPLE and CARRIE KIMPLE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
Civil Action No. 5:11CV43
(STAMP)
CONSOLIDATION COAL COMPANY,
a corporation and
RESERVE COAL PROPERTIES COMPANY,
a corporation,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT
I.
Background
The plaintiffs, Michael Hughes, Amy Hughes, Kevin Kimple, and
Carrie Kimple, filed a complaint alleging damage to the plaintiffs’
residences
because
properties.
of
subsidence
within
and
underlying
their
The plaintiffs have now filed a motion for leave to
file an amended complaint to add an additional defendant.
current defendant in the case did not file a response.
The
For the
reasons set forth below, the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend
complaint their complaint is granted.
II.
Federal
Rule
of
Applicable Law
Civil
Procedure
15(a)(1)(A)
states,
in
pertinent part, that “[a] party may amend its pleading once as a
matter of course . . . before being served with a responsive
pleading.”
If a party seeks to amend its pleadings in all other
cases, it may only do so “with the opposing party’s written consent
or the court’s leave.
justice so requires.”
Rule
15(a)
The court should freely give leave when
Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2).
grants
the
district
court
broad
discretion
concerning motions to amend pleadings, and leave should be granted
absent some reason “such as undue delay, bad faith, or dilatory
motive
on
the
part
of
the
movant,
repeated
failure
to
cure
deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to
the opposing party by virtue of allowance of the amendment or
futility of the amendment.”
Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182
(1962); see also Ward Elec. Serv. v. First Commercial Bank, 819
F.2d 496, 497 (4th Cir. 1987); Gladhill v. Gen. Motors Corp., 743
F.2d 1049, 1052 (4th Cir. 1984).
III.
Discussion
The plaintiffs seek to amend their complaint to add Reserve
Coal Properties Company as a defendant in this matter.
The
plaintiffs state that Reserve Coal Properties Company, a company
affiliated with the defendant, is likely the current owner of the
coal within and under the plaintiffs’ property.
does
not
constitute
defendants.
an
unfair
surprise
or
This amendment
prejudice
to
the
Further, the amended complaint is not futile as it
relates back to the original complaint. Consolidation Coal Company
has not responded to the plaintiffs’ motion.
After a review of the record, this Court concludes that the
plaintiffs have not exhibited any undue delay, bad faith, or
dilatory motive.
Moreover, the prejudice to the defendants is not
2
significant as to prevent this Court from allowing the amendment,
and this Court cannot conclude that the plaintiffs’ amendment would
be
futile,
as
it
relates
back
to
the
original
complaint.
Accordingly, this Court grants the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to
file an amended complaint to add Reserve Coal Properties Company as
a defendant in this civil action.
IV.
Conclusion
For the reasons set forth above, the plaintiffs’ motion for
leave to amend complaint is hereby GRANTED.
to
file
the
amended
complaint,
which
The Clerk is DIRECTED
was
attached
to
the
plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint, Docket
No. 10. The plaintiffs are DIRECTED to serve the amended complaint
on the defendants.
The parties served with the amended complaint
shall make any defenses pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
12 and any counterclaims or cross-claims pursuant to Federal Rule
of Civil Procedure 13.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this memorandum
opinion and order to counsel of record herein.
DATED:
August 17, 2011
/s/ Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.
FREDERICK P. STAMP, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?