Loving v. Batts
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 17 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge VanDervort; DENIES petitioner's 1 MOTION under 28 U.S.C. Section 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the court's docket. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 8/17/2011. (cc: Petitioner, pro se, and counsel of record) (mjp)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
BLUEFIELD DIVISION
DEBORAH LOVING,
Petitioner,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:10-0195
MYRON L. BATTS, Warden, FPC Alderson,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States
Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of findings
and recommendations regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B).
Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted to the
court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation on October 26,
2010, in which he recommended that the district court deny
petitioner’s application under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for Writ of
Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal Custody, and remove
this case from the court’s docket.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the
parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in
which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort’s
Proposed Findings and Recommendation.
The failure of any party
to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party’s
right to a de novo review by this court.
Snyder v. Ridenour, 889
F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989).
The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Proposed Findings and Recommendation within the
seventeen-day period.
Having reviewed the Proposed Findings and
1
Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court
adopts the findings and recommendation contained therein.
The court hereby DENIES petitioner’s motion under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State or Federal
Custody (Doc. # 1) and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from
the court’s docket.
The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order to Petitioner, pro se, and counsel
of record.
It is SO ORDERED this 17th day of August, 2011.
ENTER:
David A. Faber
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?