Dodson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Filing
10
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; DENIES Plaintiff's 6 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees; DISMISSES Plaintiff's 1 and 7 Complaint and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 10/1/2014. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se) (arb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT BLUEFIELD
JODI DARLENE DODSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No: 1:12-0257
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the court are plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc.
Nos. 1, 7) and Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees
(Doc. No. 6).
By Standing Order, this matter was referred to
United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for
submission of findings and recommendations regarding
disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
Magistrate
Judge VanDervort submitted to the court his Proposed Findings
and Recommendation on September 11, 2014, in which he
recommended that the district court deny plaintiff’s Application
to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees, dismiss plaintiff’s
Complaint, and remove this matter from the court’s docket.
(Doc. No. 9).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing
days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge
1
VanDervort’s Findings and Recommendation.
The failure to file
such objections constitutes a waiver of the right to a de novo
review by this court.
Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th
Cir. 1989).
Plaintiff failed to file any objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Findings and Recommendation within the seventeen-day
period.
Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed
by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court adopts the findings
and recommendation contained therein.
The court hereby DENIES plaintiff’s Application to Proceed
Without Prepayment of Fees, (Doc. No. 6), DISMISSES plaintiff’s
Complaint, (Doc. Nos. 1, 7), and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove
this case from the court’s docket.
The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff, pro se.
It is SO ORDERED this 1st day of October, 2014.
ENTER:
David A. Faber
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?