Davis v. Alderson Federal Prison Camp HSU Medical Staff
Filing
11
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ADOPTS the 9 Proposed Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort; DENIES Plaintiff's 5 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs; DISMISSES her 1 , 4 Complaint and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove this case from the Court's docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 5/13/2015. (cc: Plaintiff, Pro Se) (arb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT BLUEFIELD
LAQUISHA BONITA DAVIS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No: 1:12-01479
ALDERSON FEDERAL PRISON CAMP
HSU MEDICAL STAFF,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the court is plaintiff’s application to
proceed without prepayment of fees and costs.
(Doc. No. 5).
By
Standing Order, this matter was referred to United States
Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of findings
and recommendations regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b)(1)(B).
Magistrate Judge VanDervort submitted to the
court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation on April 16,
2015, in which he recommended that the district court deny
plaintiff’s application to proceed without prepayment of fees,
(Doc. No. 5), dismiss plaintiff’s complaint, (Doc. Nos. 1, 4),
and remove this matter from the court’s docket.
(Doc. No. 9).
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
plaintiff was allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days,
in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort’s
Findings and Recommendation.
The failure to file such
1
objections constitutes a waiver of the right to a de novo review
by this court.
Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir.
1989).
Plaintiff failed to file any objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Findings and Recommendation within the seventeen-day
period.
Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed
by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the court adopts the findings
and recommendation contained therein.
The court hereby DENIES plaintiff’s application to proceed
without prepayment of fees, (Doc. No. 5), DISMISSES her
complaint, (Doc. Nos. 1, 4), and DIRECTS the Clerk to remove
this case from the court’s docket.
The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff, pro se.
It is SO ORDERED this 13th day of May, 2015.
ENTER:
David A. Faber
Senior United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?