Benoit v. Rickard

Filing 33

MENORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Pending before the court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 13) for the Release of Information Re: 224 Conduct Code (Doc. No. 15) DHO. (ECF No. 27). By Order entered on 3/29/2017, the court ordered plaintif f to inform the court whether she wished for that document to be construed as a Notice of Appeal. See United States v. Reid, No. 10-7750, 419 F. Appx 310, 310 n.1 (4th Cir. Mar. 21, 2011). On April 10, 2017, plaintiff indicated that she wished to appeal this case. (ECF No. 29). Accordingly, plaintiff's 27 motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 4/12/2017. (cc: Plaintiff, pro se) (mk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD JO BENOIT, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-00073 BARBARA RICKARD, Warden, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 13) for the Release of Information Re: 224 Conduct Code (Doc. No. 15) DHO.” (ECF No. 27). By Order entered on March 29, 2017, the court ordered plaintiff to inform the court whether she wished for that document to be construed as a Notice of Appeal. See United States v. Reid, No. 10-7750, 419 F. App’x 310, 310 n.1 (4th Cir. Mar. 21, 2011). On April 10, 2017, plaintiff indicated that she wished to appeal this case. No. 29). (ECF Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion, ECF No. 27, is DENIED as moot. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and to plaintiff, pro se. IT IS SO ORDERED this 12th day of April, 2017. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?