Young v. Lacy et al
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the factual and legal analysis contained within the 21 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; denying Plaintiff's 15 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Signed by Judge David A. Faber on 12/5/2017. (cc: counsel of record; plaintiff - pro se) (btm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:17-03633
T.A. LACY; PERRY RICHMAN;
and AARON YOUNG,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Pending before the court is plaintiff’s pro se request for
a temporary restraining order.
ECF No. 15.
By Standing Order,
this matter was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
Cheryl A. Eifert for submission of findings and recommendations
regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).
ECF. No. 5.
Magistrate Judge Eifert submitted to the court her
Proposed Findings and Recommendation on August 24, 2017, in
which she recommended that the district court deny plaintiff's
motion for a temporary restraining order.
See ECF No. 21.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b),
the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing
days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge
Eifert’s Findings and Recommendation.
The failure to file such
objections constitutes a waiver of the right to a de novo review
by this court.
Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir.
Plaintiff failed to file any objections to the magistrate
judge's Findings and Recommendation within the seventeen-day
Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed
by Magistrate Judge Eifert, the court adopts the findings and
recommendation contained therein.
The court hereby ADOPTS the factual and legal analysis
contained within the Findings and Recommendation and DENIES
plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order.
The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this
Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record and plaintiff,
It is SO ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2017.
David A. Faber
Senior United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?