Townsend v. Berryhill

Filing 22

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The court ADOPTS the 21 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn; DENIES plaintiff's 14 Motion for Summary Judgment; GRANTS defendant's 19 request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner; and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 3/20/2019. (cc: counsel of record) (arb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD ANGELA LAZELLE TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-00328 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on January 31, 2019, in which he recommended that the district court deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; grant the defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner; affirm the final decision of the Commissioner; and dismiss this action from the docket of the court. ECF No. 21. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to the magistrate judge’s PF&R. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party’s right to a de novo review by this court. See Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). Neither party has filed any objections to the magistrate judge’s PF&R within the required time period. Accordingly, the court adopts the factual and legal analysis contained within the PF&R as follows: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED, (ECF No. 14); 2. Defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the Commissioner is GRANTED, (ECF No. 19); 3. The final decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED; and 4. The Clerk is directed to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to counsel of record. It is SO ORDERED this 20th day of March, 2019. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?