Hicks v. Canterbury et al

Filing 11

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 10 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge, dismissing plaintiff's 1 complaint and directing the Clerk to remove this case from the court's active docket. Signed by Senior Judge David A. Faber on 6/5/2024. (cc: plaintiff and counsel of record) (mk)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BLUEFIELD AMOS GABRIEL HICKS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:21-00469 STEVEN D. CANTERBURY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER By Standing Order, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for submission of findings and recommendations regarding disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn submitted to the court his Findings and Recommendation (“PF&R”) on March 11, 2024, in which he recommended that the district court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint and remove this matter from the court’s docket. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the parties were allotted fourteen days, plus three mailing days, in which to file any objections to Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn’s Findings and Recommendation. The failure of any party to file such objections constitutes a waiver of such party's right to a de novo review by this court. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363 (4th Cir. 1989). Snyder v. The parties failed to file any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation within the required time period. Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn, the court adopts the findings and recommendations contained therein. Accordingly, the court hereby DISMISSES plaintiff’s complaint and directs the Clerk to remove this case from the court’s active docket. The Clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to plaintiff and counsel of record. IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2024. ENTER: David A. Faber Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?