Taylor v. United States of America

Filing 110

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER as to Timothy Lee Taylor, Jr.; adopting Magistrate Judge Stanley's 105 Proposed Findings and Recommendation; denying movant's 94 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255); denying a certificate of appealability in this case. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 1/22/2010. (cc: Judge, USA, counsel, movant) (mkw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION TIMOTHY L. TAYLOR, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the court is the petitioner's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct sentence [Docket 94]. This action was referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the court deny the petitioner's § 2555 motion. The petitioner timely filed written objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings of fact and recommendation. Having reviewed those objections, the court concludes that they lack merit. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings of fact and DENY Taylor's motion. Furthermore, Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 and Section 2255 Cases provides that the district court "must issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant." The petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, and the court denies a certificate of appealability in this case. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:09-cv-00079 (Criminal No. 2:06-cr-00232) The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party. ENTER: January 22, 2010 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?