Campbell v. United States of America

Filing 70

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER inasmuch as the parties appear to agree to a waiver of service of process, denying as moot defendant John Perrine's 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Insufficient Service of Process. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/5/2010. (cc: attys) (mkw)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON FREDDY S. CAMPBELL, Plaintiff v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CARTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; RANDY BINION, Chief Jailer-Carter County Detention Center; JOHN PERRINE, Supervising MarshalUnited States Marshals Service; BRENDA WILBURN, R.N.-Carter County Detention Center, Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Civil Action No. 2:09-0503 Pending is the motion to dismiss of John Perrine, in his individual capacity, seeking dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) for insufficient service of process, filed June 25, 2009. Perrine contends that the plaintiff improperly served him by serving a person not authorized by him to accept service on his behalf. Although he seeks dismissal, Perrine, in his motion also states that he is willing to accept a waiver of service of process if it is acceptable to the court and to plaintiff's counsel to do so. The plaintiff states in his response that he would accept a waiver of service on behalf of Perrine. Inasmuch as the parties appear to agree to a waiver of service of process, it is ORDERED that Perrine's motion to dismiss be, and it hereby is, denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record. DATED: February 5, 2010 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?