Blake v. Ballard et al

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER because the Amended Complaint is barred by res judicata, the court DISMISSES the 6 Amended Complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/22/2010. (cc: plaintiff, pro se; Magistrate Judge Stanley; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION ROBERT BLAKE, Plaintiff, v. DAVID BALLARD, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The plaintiff filed this pro se action seeking injunctive relief in the form of an Order by the court to stop the elimination of the indigent pay program at Mount Olive Correctional Complex. The court referred this action to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, for Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge recommended that this action be dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and the plaintiff failed to timely file any objections. Accordingly, the court adopted the Magistrate Judge's findings and dismissed this action with prejudice [Docket 4]. The plaintiff has now filed an Amended Complaint asserting the same claims that were set forth in the original Complaint. Because the Amended Complaint is barred by res judicata, the court DISMISSES the Amended Complaint with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Stanley, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party. ENTER: November 22, 2010 CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:10-cv-01152

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?