Hammon v. Wolf et al

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 28 Proposed Findings and Recommendation by Magistrate Judge, and directing that this action is dismissed without prejudice and stricken from the docket. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/14/2012. (cc: attys; plaintiff; Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley) (cbo)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON STEVEN HAMMON, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-00038 SARGENT WOLF, SENIOR TROOPER JIM COLMER, OFFICER B.J. ANDERSON, Ravenswood Police Department, and JOHN DOE, K-9 Unit Officer, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action was previously referred to Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate Judge, who has submitted her Proposed Findings and Recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation entered by the magistrate judge on January 24, 2012. The magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice of plaintiff’s complaint for failure to prosecute. The plaintiff has not objected to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The court concludes the recommended disposition is correct. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted by the court; 2. This action be, and it hereby is, dismissed without prejudice, and stricken from the docket. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to the pro se plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the United States Magistrate Judge. DATED: March 14, 2102 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?