Campbell v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge, dismissing with prejudice plaintiff's 2 COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS, PERJURY, LEGAL MALPRACTICE In Re: Minor Grand-Children, and directing that this action be removed from the docket. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 6/28/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmh)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON DIVISION

BARBARA CAMPBELL
Plaintiff,
v.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-00638

WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
AND HUMAN RESOURCES, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This action was referred to the Honorable Mary E. Stanley, United States Magistrate
Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for
disposition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

The Magistrate Judge has submitted a

Proposed Findings and Recommendation [Docket 5] recommending that the court DISMISS the
plaintiff=s Complaint [Docket 2] with prejudice under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Neither party has
filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations.
A district court Ashall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or
specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.@ 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(C). This court is not, however, required to review, under a de novo or any other
standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the
findings or recommendation to which no objections are raised. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150
(1985). As the parties have not filed objections in this case, the court accepts and incorporates
herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and orders judgment consistent

with the findings and recommendations. Accordingly the court DISMISSES the plaintiff=s
Complaint [Docket 2] with prejudice and DIRECTS that this action be removed from the docket.
The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any
unrepresented party.
ENTER:

June 28, 2012