Harper v. Blagg et al
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AND CERTIFICATION THAT APPEAL IS NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH re: 50 Notice of Interlocutory Appeal to 4CCA; the Court has denied Plaintiff leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, and as directed and set forth more fully herein; certifying that because plaintiff's notice of appeal is procedurally barred, it necessarily fails to present a nonfrivolous question for review and, thus, is not taken in good faith; defendant is advised that he may file a mo tion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in accordance with Rule 24(a)(5) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 4/4/2014. (cc: Clerk, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit; plaintiff; attys; any unrepresented party) (taq)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
CHARLESTON DIVISION
CEDEAL HARPER,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19796
MICHAEL BLAGG, et al.
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
AND CERTIFICATION THAT APPEAL IS
NOT TAKEN IN GOOD FAITH
Plaintiff has noticed an interlocutory appeal [ECF 50] of the Court’s March 18, 2014
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF 47] granting the motion to dismiss filed by former
Defendants David Ballard, Jason Collins, Paul Parry, and Jim Rubenstein. The Court has today
denied Plaintiff leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis.
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3 governs appeals as of right from a district court to a
court of appeals and prescribes, among other things, the filing requirements and contents of the
notice of appeal. Further, Rule 3(e) provides: “Upon filing a notice of appeal, the appellant
must pay the district clerk all required fees. The district clerk receives the appellate docket fee on
behalf of the court of appeals.”
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(1) generally requires that a party to a district
court action who desires to appeal in forma pauperis file a motion with the district court. Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 24(a)(3)(A) & (B) provides in pertinent part that a party who was
permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court action may proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis without further authorization, unless the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken
in good faith or a statute provides otherwise.
Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915 governs in forma pauperis proceedings and
provides in pertinent part as follows:
(a)(1) Subject to subsection (b), any court of the United States may authorize the
commencement, prosecution or defense of any suit, action or proceeding, civil or
criminal, or appeal therein, without prepayment of fees or security therefor, by a
person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner
possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor. Such
affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant’s belief
that the person is entitled to redress.
(2) A prisoner seeking to bring a civil action or appeal a judgment in a civil action
or proceeding without prepayment of fees or security therefor, in addition to filing
the affidavit filed under paragraph (1), shall submit a certified copy of the trust fund
account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal,
obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which the prisoner is or was
confined.
(3) An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in
writing that it is not taken in good faith.
(b)(1) Notwithstanding subsection (a), if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an
appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a
filing fee. The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial
payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent
of the greater of-(A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account; or
(B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the 6-month
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of
appeal.
2
(2) After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner shall be required to
make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to
the prisoner's account. The agency having custody of the prisoner shall forward
payments from the prisoner's account to the clerk of the court each time the amount
in the account exceeds $10 until the filing fees are paid.
(3) In no event shall the filing fee collected exceed the amount of fees permitted
by statute for the commencement of a civil action or an appeal of a civil action or
criminal judgment.
(4) In no event shall a prisoner be prohibited from bringing a civil action or
appealing a civil or criminal judgment for the reason that the prisoner has no assets
and no means by which to pay the initial partial filing fee.
On August 6, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley granted Plaintiff’s
application to proceed in this Court without prepayment of fees and costs [ECF 6]. A prisoner
who seeks to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, however, must first obtain leave to so proceed
despite the fact that he was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court.
Boling-Bey v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 559 F.3d 1149, 1152–53 (10th Cir. 2009) (“Rule 24(a)(3) has
provided that a party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court may
continue to proceed in forma pauperis in the court of appeals without further authorization, subject
to certain conditions. The PLRA, by contrast, provides that a prisoner who was permitted to
proceed in forma pauperis in the district court and who wishes to continue to proceed in forma
pauperis on appeal may not do so ‘automatically’, but must seek permission.”) (citing Morgan v.
Haro, 112 F.3d 788, 789 (5th Cir. 1997) (“A prisoner who seeks to proceed IFP on appeal must
obtain leave to so proceed despite proceeding IFP in the district court.”). Thus, notwithstanding
the Court’s original order permitting Plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs in
the district court, Plaintiff is now obligated under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) to seek authorization to
proceed in forma pauperis for his appeal from this Court. Plaintiff has not sought leave to
3
proceed in forma pauperis with his appeal of the Court’s March 18, 2014 Memorandum Opinion
and Order.
Despite Plaintiff’s procedural misstep, this error is of no practical consequence because
Plaintiff’s notice of appeal is an attempt to appeal an order that cannot be appealed at this stage of
the case. Consequently, Plaintiff’s notice of appeal is not taken in good faith. “‘Good faith’ has
been defined as a requirement that an appeal present a nonfrivolous question for review.” Cruz v.
Hauck, 404 U.S. 59, 62 (1971). * Mindful that the matter of appellate jurisdiction is reserved to
the court of appeals, in making its good faith assessment the Court notes that Plaintiff appears to be
attempting to appeal an order dismissing some, but not all, of the Defendants in this case. As
such, this is an interlocutory order and, in the absence of the Court’s certification under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), it is not an appealable order. See Robinson v. Parke-Davis and
Co., 685 F.2d 912, 913 (4th Cir. 1982) (stating that “[b]ecause the district court’s order adjudicated
‘fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties’ ” and because the
district court did not “‘make an express determination that there [was] no just reason for delay and
. . . an express direction for the entry of judgment,’” the order was still subject to revision by the
district court and would be appealable only upon an express Rule 54(b) certification) (citing
Schnur & Co. v. McDonald, 328 F.2d 103 (4th Cir. 1964) and Wright & Miller, 10 Federal
Practice & Procedure § 2660 (1973)). Accordingly, the Court certifies that, because Plaintiff’s
notice of appeal is procedurally barred, it necessarily fails to present a nonfrivolous question for
review and, thus, is not taken in good faith.
* The Court’s research has revealed that pertinent case law addressing the good faith standard in the context of 28
U.S.C. § 1915 focuses on an examination of the merits of the issues raised by the appeal, rather than, as here, a
jurisdictional or procedural rule that bars the appeal. In certifying that this appeal is not taken in good faith under
section 1915, the Court’s ruling rests solely on the ground that the appeal is procedurally barred.
4
Defendant is advised that he may file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with
the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in accordance with Rule 24(a)(5) of the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and
Order and Statement of Reasons to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth
Circuit, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.
ENTER:
5
April 4, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?