Martin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al

Filing 38

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 11/5/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION LAURA E. MARTIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13-cv-19988 JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER On October 21, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiffs to show cause on or before November 4, 2020, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiffs have not shown cause. The court ORDERS that this case is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and plaintiffs at their last known address. ENTER: November 5, 2020

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?