Stoll v. Colvin
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 15 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, denying defendant's 13 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S DECISION, remanding this case for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and dismissing this civil action from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/19/2015. (cc: counsel of record; United States Magistrate Judge) (tmh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
GREGORY WALTER STOLL,
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-03200
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley,
entered on February 27, 2015; and the magistrate judge having
recommended that the court reverse the final decision of the
Commissioner and remand this case for further proceedings pursuant
to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and the magistrate judge
having further recommended that the court dismiss this matter from
the court’s docket; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed
Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:
The Proposed Findings and Recommendation of the
magistrate judge be, and they hereby are, adopted by the court and
The defendant’s request to affirm the decision of the
Commissioner be, and it hereby is, denied;
The case is remanded for further administrative
proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); and
This civil action be, and it hereby is, dismissed from
the docket of the court.
The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written
opinion and order to all counsel of record and the United States
March 19, 2015
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?