Miller v. Rubenstein et al
Filing
19
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting the 18 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting the defendants' 16 Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this matter from the docket of the court. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 7/27/2017. (cc: plaintiff; all counsel of record; Magistrate Judge Tinsley) (mks)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
AT CHARLESTON
ANDREW MILLER,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:15-01581
MARGARET CLIFFORD, Lt., and
JOHN DOE, Officer,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The court having received the Proposed Findings and
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley,
filed on June 29, 2017, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1)(B); and having reviewed the record in this proceeding;
and there being no objections filed by any party to the proposed
findings and recommendation; and it appearing proper so to do, it
is ORDERED that the findings and conclusions made in the proposed
findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge be, and they
hereby are, adopted by the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that defendants’ motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 16) be, and hereby is, granted.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is dismissed
from the docket of the court.
Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston, before
the undersigned, unless canceled. Lead counsel
directed to appear.
02/29/2016
Entry of scheduling order.
The Clerk day directed to forward P 26(a)(1) this written
03/08/2016
Last is to serve F.R. Civ. copies of disclosures.
opinion and order to the plaintiff, all counsel of record, and the
The Clerk is requested to transmit this Order and
United States Magistrate Judge. and to any unrepresented
Notice to all counsel of record
parties.
ENTER: July 27, 20172016
DATED: January 5,
John T. Copenhaver, Jr.
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?