Allen v. Colvin

Filing 14

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating the 13 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; denying Plaintiff's 10 Motion for judgment on the pleadings; granting the Commissioner's 11 Motion for judgment on the pleadings; affirming the decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 4/13/2016. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (tmh)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON ANGELA D. ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 15-04162 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The court having received the Proposed Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert, entered on March 18, 2016; and the magistrate judge having recommended that the court deny plaintiff Angela Allen’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, grant the Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the docket of the court with prejudice; and no objection having been filed to the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that: 1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted by the court and incorporated herein; 1 2. Plaintiff Angela Allen’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, denied; 3. The Commissioner’s motion for judgment on the pleadings be, and it hereby is, granted; and 4. The decision of the Commissioner be, and it hereby is, affirmed. The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this written opinion and order to all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties. DATED: April 13, 2016 John T. Copenhaver, Jr. United States District Court 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?